The AstraZeneca-Oxford COVID-19 vaccine has been within the headlines not too long ago over considerations that some individuals had been creating blood clots after receiving the shot. Some European nations suspended use of the vaccine, however many have since resumed.
You could be questioning what all of this implies for you in terms of taking the vaccine. This is what the consultants are saying.
What are the newest findings on AstraZeneca’s security?
A latest overview from the European Union’s drug watchdog discovered the vaccine isn’t linked to a rise within the total threat of blood clots. The European Medicines Company (EMA) additionally concluded that the advantages of defending in opposition to COVID-19 — which itself ends in clotting issues — outweigh the dangers.
On the identical time, the EMA stated it couldn’t definitively rule out a hyperlink between the vaccine and particular, uncommon varieties of blood clots related to thrombocytopenia, or low ranges of blood platelets.
WATCH | AstraZeneca vaccine is secure, says EU drug regulator:
Particularly, it famous 18 instances of a particularly uncommon kind of blood clot known as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), a situation that’s rather more widespread in girls than males. Many of the incidents occurred inside 14 days of receiving the AstraZeneca shot, and the bulk had been in girls below the age of 55.
In its investigative doc, the EMA stated it could count on to see simply 1.35 instances of CVST within the time interval it checked out — however as an alternative its researchers noticed 12.
“A causal hyperlink with the vaccine isn’t confirmed, however is feasible and deserves additional evaluation,” the company stated in its findings.
Across the identical time the EMA launched its report, researchers in Germany and Norway introduced they’d discovered a mechanism that would trigger the AstraZeneca vaccine to create the blood clots in very uncommon circumstances, along with figuring out a potential therapy for it.
Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada’s chief public well being officer, acknowledged the potential hyperlink stated in an announcement on Sunday.
“It’s potential that the vaccine could also be related to very uncommon however critical instances of blood clots related to thrombocytopenia,” she stated.
General, Well being Canada has maintained that the advantages of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine proceed to outweigh the dangers.
WATCH | Advantages of AstraZeneca vaccine outweigh dangers, Tam says:
In the meantime, AstraZeneca introduced on Monday that scientists discovered no elevated threat of clots among the many greater than 20,000 individuals who acquired no less than one dose of the shot in a late-stage research in the USA. The vaccine has not but been given the inexperienced gentle within the U.S.
The corporate stated the research additionally confirmed the vaccine offered robust safety in opposition to illness and full safety in opposition to hospitalization and loss of life throughout all age teams.
Is AstraZeneca secure for individuals with a historical past of blood clots?
Amid the developments, many readers are nonetheless questioning if having a historical past of blood clots means they’re at a better threat of creating them after getting an AstraZeneca jab.
A number of the consultants we spoke to stated no, the vaccine is secure, even for individuals with a historical past of blood clots.
“Anybody who has a historical past of blood clots may need an elevated threat of blood clots at any level anyway,” Dr. Lynora Saxinger, an infectious illness specialist on the College of Alberta in Edmonton, stated in a latest CBC Information interview.
“However I do not consider that there can be a rationale to make a suggestion in opposition to utilizing [the vaccine],” she stated.
Dr. Cora Constantinescu, an infectious ailments specialist from the Vaccine Hesitancy Clinic at Alberta Kids’s Hospital in Calgary, stated if you’re nonetheless fearful about blood clots, you have to be extra involved about catching the coronavirus than the vaccine.
“In case you checked out 5 million individuals hospitalized with COVID-19, you’d count on 100,000 to 500,000 of them to have clots,” Constantinescu stated in a latest interview with CBC Information Community.
“Take note the danger of the illness itself is a lot increased, and the extra you wait to [get the vaccine], the much less protected you’re.”
Alternatively, Dr. David Fisman, an epidemiologist on the College of Toronto’s Dalla Lana College of Public Well being, stated Germany’s information supplied a “compelling image” that the uncommon blood clots had been probably linked to the vaccine in uncommon instances.
“I discover myself in disagreement with Well being Canada’s steerage on using AstraZeneca,” Fisman stated.
“I do suppose that using this vaccine ought to be suspended in Canada till we now have extra information. At a minimal, I don’t suppose it ought to be utilized in girls aged 20 to 50 till we all know extra.”
Have blood clots been related to the opposite vaccines?
If the general price of reported blood clots after AstraZeneca is not more than the speed within the normal inhabitants, quite a lot of readers, together with Carolyn W., needed to know why we’re not listening to related points with the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
“That is a terrific query,” Constantinescu stated.
When it comes to a blood clot, she stated, the numbers appeared related “throughout the board” for all the vaccines, together with the mRNA vaccines.
Constantinescu tried to place the figures into perspective.
“In case you took 5 million individuals, you’d count on 5,000 to fifteen,000 instances of blood clots versus the 37 that had been famous,” she stated. “So if something, even within the vaccinated inhabitants, there appeared to be a decrease baseline price than you’d [have] within the normal inhabitants.”
WATCH | Can AstraZeneca vaccine overcome combined messaging, mistrust?
There have not been any substantial experiences of clotting through the scientific trials for the vaccines, Saxinger famous.
Many of the vaccine information has been “principally equal within the vaccine versus placebo recipient group,” she stated. “And there definitely hasn’t been a robust population-based sign particularly for [deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism] to this point.”
What in the event you’re immunocompromised?
In case you’ve acquired an autoimmune illness or are taking an immunosuppressant drug, it is in all probability a good suggestion to speak to your physician.
That is as a result of every situation is so completely different, Dr. Isaac Bogoch, an infectious illness doctor in Toronto and a member of Ontario’s COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution Activity Pressure, suggested in an earlier article.
Generally, the consultants we spoke to stated AstraZeneca might be secure for immunocompromised individuals, however we’re nonetheless studying extra.
The Nationwide Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI), which makes suggestions on using newly accredited vaccines in Canada, notes there may be at the moment no information on COVID-19 vaccination in people who’re immunosuppressed, as they weren’t included within the scientific trials.
“The priority isn’t a lot a few security challenge,” Saxinger stated, noting that AstraZeneca is taken into account as secure as every other non-live vaccine. You’ll be able to learn extra about various kinds of vaccines right here.
The actual challenge, Saxinger stated, is “whether or not or not your explicit immune change will can help you get a completely protecting response.”
“That is the place we’re nonetheless studying extra.”
However even when immunocompromised individuals have barely much less safety than others, they need to go forward and get the vaccine, she stated, as a result of even {a partially} protecting response in opposition to a extreme COVID-19 an infection is worth it.
Constantinescu added that it is possible immunocompromised individuals may have booster doses sooner or later.
In case you’re supplied AstraZeneca, are you able to refuse?
Positive. Nobody goes to pressure you to take anyone vaccine if you don’t need it. COVID-19 vaccines aren’t necessary.
However that does not imply you’ll instantly be supplied one other vaccine. That may rely on the province you reside in, Constantinescu stated.
For instance, Quebec’s director of public well being has stated that individuals who refuse to take the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine will probably be bumped to the again of the road and need to make one other appointment.
And ready may very well be dangerous, particularly as some provinces are seeing case counts rise, Constantinescu stated.
“You might be placing your self in danger ready for a unique vaccine after we know that this vaccine works rather well at stopping hospitalization, severity and loss of life,” she stated.
Have a query?
Ship your questions to [email protected]